Carolyn O'Connor v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999314499-2] Originating case number: 3:14-cv-00108-JRS Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999363733]. Mailed to: Carolyn O'Connor. [14-1178]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-1178 Doc: 9 Filed: 05/28/2014 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1178 CAROLYN E. O’CONNOR, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (3:14-cv-00108-JRS) Submitted: May 22, 2014 Before TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Chief Decided: May 28, 2014 Judge, and HAMILTON and DAVIS, Senior Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Carolyn E. O’Connor, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-1178 Doc: 9 Filed: 05/28/2014 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Carolyn E. O’Connor appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for leave to file a complaint because she failed to comply with the pre-filing injunction imposed by that court in reversible 2006. We error. have reviewed Accordingly, we the deny record leave and to find no proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. (E.D. Va. Feb. 18, O’Connor v. Virginia, No. 3:14-cv-00108-JRS 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?