Carolyn O'Connor v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999314499-2] Originating case number: 3:14-cv-00108-JRS Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999363733]. Mailed to: Carolyn O'Connor. [14-1178]
Appeal: 14-1178
Doc: 9
Filed: 05/28/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1178
CAROLYN E. O’CONNOR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
James R. Spencer, District
Judge. (3:14-cv-00108-JRS)
Submitted:
May 22, 2014
Before TRAXLER,
Circuit Judges.
Chief
Decided: May 28, 2014
Judge,
and
HAMILTON
and
DAVIS,
Senior
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carolyn E. O’Connor, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-1178
Doc: 9
Filed: 05/28/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Carolyn E. O’Connor appeals the district court’s order
denying her motion for leave to file a complaint because she
failed to comply with the pre-filing injunction imposed by that
court
in
reversible
2006.
We
error.
have
reviewed
Accordingly,
we
the
deny
record
leave
and
to
find
no
proceed
in
forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by
the district court.
(E.D.
Va.
Feb.
18,
O’Connor v. Virginia, No. 3:14-cv-00108-JRS
2014).
We
dispense
with
oral
argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?