William Black v. United States Army
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-00889-NCT-LPA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999363505]. Mailed to: Black. [14-1194]
Appeal: 14-1194
Doc: 8
Filed: 05/28/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1194
WILLIAM REID BLACK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
THE UNITED STATES ARMY; ARMY REVIEW BOARD AGENCY; CAPTAIN
PULSON, Captain of Batter A 15FD; THOMAS WHITE, Secretary of
Army (U.S.); JOHN M. MCHUGH, U.S. Army Special Affairs; RICK
A. SCHWEIGERT, Chief Congressional Special Action Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro.
N. Carlton Tilley,
Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:13-cv-00889-NCT-LPA)
Submitted:
May 22, 2014
Before TRAXLER,
Circuit Judges.
Chief
Decided: May 28, 2014
Judge,
and
HAMILTON
and
DAVIS,
Senior
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Reid Black, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-1194
Doc: 8
Filed: 05/28/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
William Reid Black appeals the district court’s order
accepting
the
dismissing,
recommendation
under
28 U.S.C.
of
the
magistrate
§ 1915(e)(2)(B)
judge
(2012),
and
Black’s
complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents
of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
We have
Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
v.
U.S.
2014).
legal
before
Army,
No.
1:13-cv-00889-NCT-LPA
(M.D.N.C.
Black
Jan.
23,
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?