William Black v. United States Army

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-00889-NCT-LPA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999363505]. Mailed to: Black. [14-1194]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-1194 Doc: 8 Filed: 05/28/2014 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1194 WILLIAM REID BLACK, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THE UNITED STATES ARMY; ARMY REVIEW BOARD AGENCY; CAPTAIN PULSON, Captain of Batter A 15FD; THOMAS WHITE, Secretary of Army (U.S.); JOHN M. MCHUGH, U.S. Army Special Affairs; RICK A. SCHWEIGERT, Chief Congressional Special Action Officer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:13-cv-00889-NCT-LPA) Submitted: May 22, 2014 Before TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Chief Decided: May 28, 2014 Judge, and HAMILTON and DAVIS, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Reid Black, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-1194 Doc: 8 Filed: 05/28/2014 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: William Reid Black appeals the district court’s order accepting the dismissing, recommendation under 28 U.S.C. of the magistrate § 1915(e)(2)(B) judge (2012), and Black’s complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. v. U.S. 2014). legal before Army, No. 1:13-cv-00889-NCT-LPA (M.D.N.C. Black Jan. 23, We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?