McElroy Coal Company v. DOWCP
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 13-0224 BLA. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999693573]. [14-1251]
Appeal: 14-1251
Doc: 66
Filed: 11/05/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1251
MCELROY COAL COMPANY,
Petitioner,
v.
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; DONN L. WNEK,
Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.
(13-0224 BLA)
Submitted:
October 30, 2015
Decided:
November 5, 2015
Before GREGORY and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jeffrey R. Soukup, JACKSON KELLY PLLC, Lexington, Kentucky, for
Petitioner.
M. Patricia Smith, Solicitor of Labor, Rae Ellen
James, Associate Solicitor, Gary K. Stearman, Ann Marie
Scarpino, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C.;
Heath
M.
Long,
PAWLOWSKI,
BILONICK
&
LONG,
Ebensburg,
Pennsylvania, for Respondents.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-1251
Doc: 66
Filed: 11/05/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
McElroy Coal Company seeks review of the Benefits Review
Board’s
decision
and
order
affirming
the
administrative
law
judge’s award of black lung benefits on a claim filed by Donn L.
Wnek pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2012).
of
the
record,
supported
error.
by
we
conclude
substantial
that
evidence
the
and
Upon our review
Board’s
is
decision
without
is
reversible
See McElroy Coal Co. v. Dir., Office of Workers’ Comp.
Programs, No. 13-0224 BLA (B.R.B. Jan. 14, 2014).
we deny the petition for review.
Accordingly,
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this Court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?