Highland Construction Manageme v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-01244-CMH-TRJ,11-bk-11413-RGM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999442823].. [14-1259]

Appeal: 14-1259

Doc: 24

Filed: 09/25/2014

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1259

IN RE:

HIGHLAND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LP,
Debtor,

------------------------------------------------------HIGHLAND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LP,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, NA, for the use and benefit of Jerome
Guyant IRA,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:13-cv-01244-CMH-TRJ; 11-bk-11413-RGM)

Submitted:

September 24, 2014

Decided:

September 25, 2014

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James P. Campbell, CAMPBELL FLANNERY PC, Leesburg, Virginia, for
Appellant. Neil D. Goldman, GOLDMAN & VAN BEEK, PC, Alexandria,
Virginia, for Appellee.

Appeal: 14-1259

Doc: 24

Filed: 09/25/2014

Pg: 2 of 3

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 14-1259

Doc: 24

Filed: 09/25/2014

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Highland Construction Mgmt. Servs., LP, appeals from
the

district

court’s

order

affirming

the

bankruptcy

court’s

order allowing the proof of claim filed by Wells Fargo Bank, NA
(FBO

Jerome

priority.
well

as

Guyant

IRA)

as

a

secured

claim,

entitled

to

We have reviewed the record included on appeal, as
the

parties’

briefs,

and

find

no

reversible

error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the courts below.
Highland Constr. Mgmt. Servs., LP v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.,
Nos. 1:13-cv-01244-CMH-TRJ; 11-bk-11413-RGM (E.D. Va. filed Feb.
21, 2014, entered Feb. 24, 2014; July 30, 2013).

We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately

presented

in

the

materials

before

this

court

and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3