Donald Lewis v. Private Simm

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:11-cv-02172-PWG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999422016]. Mailed to: Donald Lewis. [14-1282]

Appeal: 14-1282

Doc: 10

Filed: 08/25/2014

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1282

DONALD FREDERICK LEWIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PRIVATE SIMMS,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
CITY OF BOWIE, a body corporate and politic; PRINCE GEORGE’S
COUNTY, a body corporate and politic,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:11cv-02172-PWG)

Submitted:

August 21, 2014

Decided:

August 25, 2014

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donald Frederick Lewis, Appellant Pro
Peter, Hanover, Maryland, for Appellee.

Se.

Matthew

Douglas

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-1282

Doc: 10

Filed: 08/25/2014

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Donald
court’s

orders

Frederick
dismissing

Lewis
his

appeals

claims

from

against

the

district

Prince

George’s

County, Maryland, and the City of Bowie, Maryland, and entering
judgment

Simms

on

Lewis’s claims asserted pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012).

On

appeal,

on

we

the

jury

confine

appellant’s brief.

verdict

our

in

review

to

favor

the

of

Private

issues

See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).

raised

in

the

Because Lewis’s

informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district
court’s disposition, Lewis has forfeited appellate review of the
court’s orders.
orders.
legal
before

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

contentions
this

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.
AFFIRMED

2