Hephzibah Bates v. Bernadette Thompson
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999335156-2] Originating case number: 3:14-cv-00065-REP Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999366745]. Mailed to: Hephzibah Bates. [14-1283]
Appeal: 14-1283
Doc: 7
Filed: 06/02/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1283
HEPHZIBAH BATES,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
BERNADETTE BATES THOMPSON,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:14-cv-00065-REP)
Submitted:
May 29, 2014
Decided:
June 2, 2014
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Hephzibah Bates, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-1283
Doc: 7
Filed: 06/02/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Hephzibah
Bates
appeals
the
district
denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis.
the record and find no reversible error.
court’s
order
We have reviewed
Accordingly, we deny
leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for
the reasons stated by the district court.
Bates v. Thompson,
No. 3:14-cv-00065-REP (E.D. Va. Feb. 24, 2014).
We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?