Reginald Stewart v. US

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:13-cv-03610-PWG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999451925].. [14-1306]

Appeal: 14-1306

Doc: 22

Filed: 10/08/2014

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1306

REGINALD B. STEWART,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
CELINA M. INMAN; VALERIE A. HUTTON,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:13cv-03610-PWG)

Submitted:

September 22, 2014

Decided:

October 8, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eden Brown Gaines, BROWN GAINES, LLC, White Plains, Maryland,
for Appellant.
Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney,
Victor M. Lawrence, Special Assistant United States Attorney,
Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Appeal: 14-1306

Doc: 22

Filed: 10/08/2014

Pg: 2 of 3

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 14-1306

Doc: 22

Filed: 10/08/2014

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Reginald B. Stewart appeals the district court’s order
denying his request for limited discovery and dismissing his
complaint

for

lack

of

subject

matter

jurisdiction.

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

We

have

Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Stewart

v. United States, No. 8:13-cv-03610-PWG (D. Md. Mar. 7, 2014).
We

dispense

contentions

with
are

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the

facts

and

the

materials

legal
before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3