Ross Fiorani, Jr. v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:14-cv-00216-JRS Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999460961]. Mailed to: Ross Fiorani, Jr.. [14-1335]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-1335 Doc: 16 Filed: 10/23/2014 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1335 ROSS A. FIORANI, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, and NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT; AMERICAN EXPRESS BANK; MERRIFIELD, VIRGINIA; BARCLAYS BANK; TD BANK; WEST PUBLISHING; ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY; VIRGINIA TAX DEPARTMENT; FAIRFAX COUNTY TAX AUTHORITY; CAPITAL ONE, (401K/Roth), Plaintiffs, v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, et al; COMMISSIONERS OF THE TREASURY; DMV; MVDB; VITA’S AGENTS; MR. CANARY; MS. BROWN; MS. WOOD-HENRY; MS. ESTES; SAMUEL A. NIXON, JR., et al, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Senior District Judge. (3:14-cv-00216-JRS) Submitted: October 21, 2014 Decided: Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. October 23, 2014 Appeal: 14-1335 Doc: 16 Filed: 10/23/2014 Pg: 2 of 3 Ross A. Fiorani, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 14-1335 Doc: 16 Filed: 10/23/2014 Pg: 3 of 3 Fiorani, appeals PER CURIAM: Ross order A. dismissing § 1915(e) his (2012). reversible error. Jr., civil We have complaint reviewed the pursuant the record adequately 28 and U.S.C. find no Fiorani v. Commonwealth of Va., No. 3:14-cv-00216-JRS (E.D. Va. Apr. 1, 2014). argument to court’s Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. oral district because presented in the the facts and materials legal before We dispense with contentions this court are and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?