Pascal Etcheber v. FBI

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:13-cv-00752-JFA. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999444580]. Mailed to: Pascal Etcheber. [14-1338]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-1338 Doc: 10 Filed: 09/29/2014 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1338 PASCAL ANDRE PIERRE ETCHEBER, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION; UNITED STATES, Defendants - Appellants, and DAVID ESPIE, Counter Intelligence Special Agent, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (2:13-cv-00752-JFA) Submitted: September 25, 2014 Decided: September 29, 2014 Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Pascal Andre Etcheber, Appellant Bowens, Assistant United States Carolina, for Appellee. Pro Se. Attorney, Barbara Murcier Columbia, South Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-1338 Doc: 10 Filed: 09/29/2014 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Pascal court’s judge order and Andre Pierre accepting denying the relief on Etcheber appeals the recommendation of his filed complaint the district magistrate pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and the Federal Tort Claims Act. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. we affirm for the reasons stated by the We have Accordingly, district court. Etcheber v. Fed. Bureau of Investigation, No. 2:13-cv-00752-JFA (D.S.C. Mar. 28, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?