Fidel Gonzalez v. Alejandro Mayorka
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-01230-TSE-JFA. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999467434]. [14-1360]
Appeal: 14-1360
Doc: 23
Filed: 11/03/2014
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1360
FIDEL ANGEL VASQUEZ GONZALEZ,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
KIMBERLY
ZANNOTTI,
United
States
Citizenship
and
Immigration Services, Washington Field Office Director;
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Department of
Justice; JEH JOHNSON, Secretary of the Department of
Homeland Security; LEON RODRIGUEZ, Director, United States
Citizenship and Immigration Services,
Respondents – Appellees,
and
RAND BEERS,
Security,
Acting
Secretary,
Department
of
Homeland
Respondent.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
T. S. Ellis, III, Senior
District Judge. (1:13-cv-01230-TSE-JFA)
Submitted:
October 31, 2014
Decided:
November 3, 2014
Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Appeal: 14-1360
Doc: 23
Filed: 11/03/2014
Pg: 2 of 3
Christopher A. Bowen, Nancy Noonan, ARENT FOX LLP, Washington,
D.C., for Appellant. Dana J. Boente, United States Attorney,
Antonia
M.
Konkoly,
Assistant
United
States
Attorney,
Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 14-1360
Doc: 23
Filed: 11/03/2014
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Fidel Angel Vasquez Gonzalez filed a petition in the
district
court
compelling
for
the
a
writ
United
of
seeking
Citizenship
States
mandamus
and
an
order
Immigration
Services (USCIS) to adjudicate his Form I-485 application for
adjustment of status.
The district court dismissed the petition
against USCIS as moot based on its finding that USCIS lacked
jurisdiction
over
the
adjustment
administratively
closed
appeal,
Gonzalez
Vasquez
and
application
dismissed
challenges
the
this
and
had
already
application.
finding.
We
On
have
reviewed the administrative record and agree that USCIS does not
have jursidiction over the adjustment application.
Accordingly,
we affirm the dismissal of the mandamus petition for the reasons
stated
by
the
district
1:13-cv-01230-TSE-JFA
court.
(E.D.
Va.
Gonzalez
Feb. 12,
v.
Rodriguez,
2014).
We
No.
dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?