Banoro Garrett v. R. Weiler

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:12-cv-00295-RAJ-LRL. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999403632]. Mailed to: Banoro Garrett. [14-1364]

Appeal: 14-1364

Doc: 20

Filed: 07/28/2014

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1364

BANORO GARRETT,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
LIEUTENANT R. H. WEILER; SERGEANT R. D. LEWIS; ROBERT J.
MCCABE; LIEUTENANT BONILLA; M/DEPUTY A. MEARS; JANEL
CUMMINGS,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
THE NORFOLK POLICE DEPARTMENT; THE NORFOLK SHERIFF’S
OFFICE; THE CITY OF NORFOLK; OFFICER D. A. PACIFICO;
OFFICER H. G. WHITE; SERGEANT G. SNYDER; DEPUTY TAYLOR; L.
WILLIS; P. BELL; J. KIDD; DARRELL HILL,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:12-cv-00295-RAJ-LRL)

Submitted:

July 24, 2014

Before FLOYD and
Circuit Judge.

THACKER,

Decided: July 28, 2014

Circuit

Judges,

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

and

DAVIS,

Senior

Appeal: 14-1364

Doc: 20

Filed: 07/28/2014

Pg: 2 of 3

Banoro Garrett, Appellant Pro Se. Melvin Wayne Ringer, CITY
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Norfolk, Virginia; Lisa H. Leiner, HARMAN,
CLAYTOR, CORRIGAN & WELLMAN, Richmond, Virginia; Ruth Griggs,
Joel Mark McCray, SANDS ANDERSON, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 14-1364

Doc: 20

Filed: 07/28/2014

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Banoro

Garrett

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.
have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

We

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.

Garrett v. Weiler, No. 2:12-cv-00295-RAJ-LRL (E.D. Va.

filed Mar. 25 & entered Mar. 26, 2014).

We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3