Malik Bey v. Shapiro Brown & Alt, LLP

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:13-cv-01562-PWG. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999449448]. Mailed to: Malik Bey. [14-1378]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-1378 Doc: 18 Filed: 10/06/2014 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1378 MALIK BEY, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. SHAPIRO BROWN & ALT, LLP, Substitute Trustees; NEW YORK COMMUNITY BANK, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:13-cv-01562-PWG) Submitted: September 16, 2014 Decided: October 6, 2014 Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Malik Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Bizhan Beiramee, Alexander Richard Green, MCGINNIS WUTSCHER BEIRAMEE, LLP, Bethesda, Maryland; Craig James Franco, ODIN, FELDMAN & PITTLEMAN, PC, Reston, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-1378 Doc: 18 Filed: 10/06/2014 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Malik Bey appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint alleging violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692-1692y (2012), the Maryland Consumer Debt Collections Act, Md. Code Ann., Com. Law, §§ 14-201 to -204, and the Maryland Consumer Protection Act, Md. Code Ann., Com. Law, §§ 13-101 have -501, and the record and denying reconsideration. We reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. reviewed to find no Bey v. Shapiro Brown & Alt, LLP, No. 8:13-cv-01562-PWG (D. Md. Feb. 20 & Mar. 21, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?