Malik Bey v. Shapiro Brown & Alt, LLP
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:13-cv-01562-PWG. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999449448]. Mailed to: Malik Bey. [14-1378]
Appeal: 14-1378
Doc: 18
Filed: 10/06/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1378
MALIK BEY,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
SHAPIRO BROWN & ALT, LLP, Substitute Trustees; NEW YORK
COMMUNITY BANK,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Paul W. Grimm, District Judge.
(8:13-cv-01562-PWG)
Submitted:
September 16, 2014
Decided:
October 6, 2014
Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Malik Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Bizhan Beiramee, Alexander Richard
Green, MCGINNIS WUTSCHER BEIRAMEE, LLP, Bethesda, Maryland;
Craig James Franco, ODIN, FELDMAN & PITTLEMAN, PC, Reston,
Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-1378
Doc: 18
Filed: 10/06/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Malik
Bey
appeals
the
district
court’s
orders
dismissing his complaint alleging violations of the Fair Debt
Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692-1692y (2012), the
Maryland Consumer Debt Collections Act, Md. Code Ann., Com. Law,
§§ 14-201 to -204, and the Maryland Consumer Protection Act, Md.
Code
Ann.,
Com.
Law,
§§ 13-101
have
-501,
and
the
record
and
denying
reconsideration.
We
reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court.
reviewed
to
find
no
Bey v. Shapiro Brown & Alt, LLP, No.
8:13-cv-01562-PWG (D. Md. Feb. 20 & Mar. 21, 2014).
We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?