Akil Rashidi Bey v. Commonwealth

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-00176-LO-IDD Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999403799]. Mailed to: Rashidi Bey. [14-1398]

Appeal: 14-1398

Doc: 13

Filed: 07/28/2014

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1398

AKIL RASHIDI BEY, ex rel. Akido Graves,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
COMMONWEALTH; PWC ADULT DETENTION CENTER; TRACY CALVIN
HUDSON, Judge, In his personal and official capacity; LON
EDWARD FARRIS, Judge, In his personal and official capacity;
PWC PRETRIAL SERVICES JANE DOE 1, In her personal and
official capacity; PWC SHERIFF DEPT AND CO’S JANE DOE 1, In
their personal and official capacity; SHANDRA COBB, In their
personal and official capacity; JAMIE SANSALE, In their
personal and official capacity; CASA, In their personal and
official capacity; CARYLON GRAHM, In their personal and
official capacity; PWC SHERIFF DEPT AND CO’S JOHN DOE 1-3,
In their personal and official capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Liam O’Grady, District
Judge. (1:13-cv-00176-LO-IDD)

Submitted:

July 24, 2014

Before FLOYD and
Circuit Judge.

THACKER,

Decided: July 28, 2014

Circuit

Judges,

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

and

DAVIS,

Senior

Appeal: 14-1398

Doc: 13

Filed: 07/28/2014

Pg: 2 of 3

Akil Rashidi Bey, Appellant Pro Se.
John David McChesney,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia;
Alexander Francuzenko, COOK CRAIG & FRANCUZENKO, PLLC, Fairfax,
Virginia; Jeffrey
Notz,
COUNTY
ATTORNEY’S
OFFICE,
Prince
William, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 14-1398

Doc: 13

Filed: 07/28/2014

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Akil Rashidi Bey appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.
the record and find no reversible error.
for

the

reasons

stated

by

the

We have reviewed

Accordingly, we affirm

district

court.

Bey

v.

Commonwealth, No. 1:13-cv-00176-LO-IDD (E.D. Va. Mar. 20, 2014).
We

dispense

contentions

with
are

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the

facts

and

the

materials

legal
before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3