In re: Michael Darby

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999349080-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999349079-2] Originating case number: 5:07-cr-01253-MBS-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999406840]. Mailed to: Darby. [14-1431]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-1431 Doc: 7 Filed: 07/31/2014 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1431 In re: MICHAEL ANTHONY DARBY, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:07-cr-01253-MBS-1) Submitted: July 29, 2014 Decided: July 31, 2014 Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Anthony Darby, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-1431 Doc: 7 Filed: 07/31/2014 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Michael Anthony Darby petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that, on June 27, 2014, the district court granted the Government’s motion for summary judgment on Darby’s § 2255 motion except as to Darby’s claim that counsel was ineffective in failing to adequately advise him regarding a formal plea offer. The court ordered this claim be held in abeyance pending an evidentiary hearing. Accordingly, because the district court has recently acted on Darby’s § 2255 motion, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. to proceed in forma pauperis. We grant leave We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?