Maress Brown v. Rick Minichbauer

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-00474-JAB-JEP. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999480703]. Mailed to: Maress Brown. [14-1432]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-1432 Doc: 11 Filed: 11/24/2014 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1432 MARESS BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RICK MINICHBAUER, Human Distribution Center; MATT Distribution Center, Resource Manager, HENRY, Supervisor, K-Mart K-Mart Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:13-cv-00474-JAB-JEP) Submitted: November 20, 2014 Decided: November 24, 2014 Before KING and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Maress Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Douglas Dellinger, Molly Mitchell Shah, LITTLER MENDELSON PC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-1432 Doc: 11 Filed: 11/24/2014 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Maress dismissing Brown his Title appeals VII the district employment court’s discrimination order action because Brown did not (a) name a proper “employer,” as that term is defined in administratively Defendants. raised in 42 U.S.C. exhaust his § 2000e(b) claims as (2012); to the and two (b) named On appeal, we confine our review to the issues the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Brown’s informal brief does not challenge either basis for the district court’s disposition, appellate review of the court’s order. the district court’s judgment. Brown has forfeited Accordingly, we affirm We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?