Maress Brown v. Rick Minichbauer
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-00474-JAB-JEP. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999480703]. Mailed to: Maress Brown. [14-1432]
Appeal: 14-1432
Doc: 11
Filed: 11/24/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1432
MARESS BROWN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RICK
MINICHBAUER,
Human
Distribution
Center;
MATT
Distribution Center,
Resource
Manager,
HENRY,
Supervisor,
K-Mart
K-Mart
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr.,
Senior District Judge. (1:13-cv-00474-JAB-JEP)
Submitted:
November 20, 2014
Decided:
November 24, 2014
Before KING and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Maress Brown, Appellant Pro Se.
Stephen Douglas Dellinger,
Molly Mitchell Shah, LITTLER MENDELSON PC, Charlotte, North
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-1432
Doc: 11
Filed: 11/24/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Maress
dismissing
Brown
his
Title
appeals
VII
the
district
employment
court’s
discrimination
order
action
because Brown did not (a) name a proper “employer,” as that term
is
defined
in
administratively
Defendants.
raised
in
42
U.S.C.
exhaust
his
§ 2000e(b)
claims
as
(2012);
to
the
and
two
(b)
named
On appeal, we confine our review to the issues
the
Appellant’s
brief.
See
4th
Cir.
R.
34(b).
Because Brown’s informal brief does not challenge either basis
for
the
district
court’s
disposition,
appellate review of the court’s order.
the district court’s judgment.
Brown
has
forfeited
Accordingly, we affirm
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?