Daryl Linard Bright v. Governor Nikki Haley
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:14-cv-01132-DCN Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999406830]. Mailed to: Bright. [14-1437]
Appeal: 14-1437
Doc: 6
Filed: 07/31/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1437
DARYL LINARD BRIGHT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GOVERNOR NIKKI HALEY; SC DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE; NORTH
CHARLESTON POLICE DEPARTMENT; OFFICER DANIEL RYAN GREEN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(2:14-cv-01132-DCN)
Submitted:
July 29, 2014
Decided:
July 31, 2014
Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daryl Linard Bright, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-1437
Doc: 6
Filed: 07/31/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Daryl Linard Bright appeals the district court’s order
adopting
the
recommendation
of
the
magistrate
judge
dismissing his civil complaint without prejudice.
may
exercise
jurisdiction
only
over
final
and
This court
orders,
28
U.S.C.
§ 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders,
28
U.S.C.
§ 1292
(2012);
Fed.
R.
Civ.
P.
54(b);
Cohen
Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).
v.
The
order Bright seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an
appealable interlocutory or collateral order, as Bright may be
able to save the action by amending his complaint to cure the
pleading deficiencies identified by the district court.
Domino
Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064,
1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993).
lack of jurisdiction.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for
We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?