Adam Perry v. Entertainment One
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999363089-2]. Originating case number: 2:13-cv-00022-BR. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999444584]. Mailed to: Adam Perry. [14-1440]
Appeal: 14-1440
Doc: 17
Filed: 09/29/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1440
ADAM L. PERRY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ENTERTAINMENT ONE (KOCH RECORDS),
Defendant - Appellee,
and
EMI MUSIC, INCORPORATED; LENCH MOB RECORDS; WILLIAM CALHOUN,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City.
W. Earl Britt,
Senior District Judge. (2:13-cv-00022-BR)
Submitted:
September 25, 2014
Decided:
September 29, 2014
Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Adam L. Perry, Appellant Pro Se.
Daniel J. Aaron, DANIEL J.
AARON, PC, New York, New York; Ernest Bradley Evans, WARD &
SMITH, PA, Greenville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-1440
Doc: 17
Filed: 09/29/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Adam
L.
Perry
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
granting summary judgment to Defendants on his claim that they
misappropriated his identity.
find
no
reversible
error.
We have reviewed the record and
Accordingly,
reasons stated by the district court.
affirm
for
the
Perry v. Entm’t One, No.
2:13-cv-00022-BR (E.D.N.C. Apr. 23, 2014).
to proceed in forma pauperis.
we
We grant Perry leave
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?