Adam Perry v. Entertainment One

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999363089-2]. Originating case number: 2:13-cv-00022-BR. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999444584]. Mailed to: Adam Perry. [14-1440]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-1440 Doc: 17 Filed: 09/29/2014 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1440 ADAM L. PERRY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ENTERTAINMENT ONE (KOCH RECORDS), Defendant - Appellee, and EMI MUSIC, INCORPORATED; LENCH MOB RECORDS; WILLIAM CALHOUN, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (2:13-cv-00022-BR) Submitted: September 25, 2014 Decided: September 29, 2014 Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Adam L. Perry, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel J. Aaron, DANIEL J. AARON, PC, New York, New York; Ernest Bradley Evans, WARD & SMITH, PA, Greenville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-1440 Doc: 17 Filed: 09/29/2014 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Adam L. Perry appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants on his claim that they misappropriated his identity. find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record and Accordingly, reasons stated by the district court. affirm for the Perry v. Entm’t One, No. 2:13-cv-00022-BR (E.D.N.C. Apr. 23, 2014). to proceed in forma pauperis. we We grant Perry leave We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?