Ron Metcalf v. Susan Call

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:14-cv-00010-MR-DLH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999443866]. Mailed to: Metcalf. [14-1443]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-1443 Doc: 7 Filed: 09/26/2014 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1443 RON DAVID METCALF, Head of Household, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. SUSAN CALL, official and individual capacity; co-owner of Darnell Farms, also Board of Directors, Swain Co. NC Safehouse; KIMBERLY LAY, official and individual capacity; Legal Attorney for Swain Co., NC; JUDGE RICHLYN HOLT, Individual Capacity; Chief Judge of District 30, NC; ERIC STILES, Attorney in Bryson City, NC; GREG BOYER, Attorney in Franklin, NC; DAVID MOORE, Attorney in Sylva, NC, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Bryson City. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (2:14-cv-00010-MR-DLH) Submitted: September 23, 2014 Decided: September 26, 2014 Before WILKINSON and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ron David Metcalf, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-1443 Doc: 7 Filed: 09/26/2014 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Ron David Metcalf appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 & 14141 (2012) without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Metcalf v. Call, Mar. 31, 2014). We dispense facts and materials legal before No. 2:14-cv-00010-MR-DLH with oral argument contentions are adequately this and argument court (W.D.N.C. because presented would not the in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?