Ron Metcalf v. Susan Call
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:14-cv-00010-MR-DLH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999443866]. Mailed to: Metcalf. [14-1443]
Appeal: 14-1443
Doc: 7
Filed: 09/26/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1443
RON DAVID METCALF, Head of Household,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
SUSAN CALL, official and individual capacity; co-owner of
Darnell Farms, also Board of Directors, Swain Co. NC
Safehouse; KIMBERLY LAY, official and individual capacity;
Legal Attorney for Swain Co., NC; JUDGE RICHLYN HOLT,
Individual Capacity; Chief Judge of District 30, NC; ERIC
STILES, Attorney in Bryson City, NC; GREG BOYER, Attorney
in Franklin, NC; DAVID MOORE, Attorney in Sylva, NC,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Bryson City.
Martin K.
Reidinger, District Judge. (2:14-cv-00010-MR-DLH)
Submitted:
September 23, 2014
Decided:
September 26, 2014
Before WILKINSON and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ron David Metcalf, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-1443
Doc: 7
Filed: 09/26/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Ron David Metcalf appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his complaint under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 & 14141
(2012) without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2012).
We
have
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
reversible
error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.
Metcalf
v.
Call,
Mar. 31,
2014).
We
dispense
facts
and
materials
legal
before
No.
2:14-cv-00010-MR-DLH
with
oral
argument
contentions
are
adequately
this
and
argument
court
(W.D.N.C.
because
presented
would
not
the
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?