Launeil Sanders v. EPA Administrator

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999394173-2] Originating case number: 7:13-cv-02945-RBH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999460966]. Mailed to: Sanders. [14-1455]

Appeal: 14-1455

Doc: 10

Filed: 10/23/2014

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1455

LAUNEIL SANDERS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
EPA ADMINISTRATOR;
PAPER COMPANY,

SCDHEC;

ABITIBI

BOWATER;

INTERNATIONAL

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Spartanburg.
R. Bryan Harwell, District
Judge. (7:13-cv-02945-RBH)

Submitted:

October 21, 2014

Decided:

October 23, 2014

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Launeil Sanders, Appellant Pro Se.
Tamara N. Rountree, UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-1455

Doc: 10

Filed: 10/23/2014

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Launeil
accepting

the

Sanders

appeals

recommendation

of

the
the

district

court’s

magistrate

order

judge

and

dismissing his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)
(2012).

We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal

is frivolous.

Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the
district court.

See Sanders v. EPA Adm’r, No. 7:13–cv–02945–RBH

(D.S.C. Apr. 21, 2014).

We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials

before

this

court

and

argument

would

not

aid

the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

2