Michael Vukosa v. Sourcefire, Inc.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-02271-JFM,1:13-cv-02332-JFM,1:13-cv-02377-JFM,1:13-cv-02483-JKB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999477970]. Mailed to: Buchanan, Connolly, Daniell, Gerard, Insler, Kanada, michels, Oddo, Rieger, Smith, Webb, Yankind. [14-1482]

Appeal: 14-1482

Doc: 23

Filed: 11/19/2014

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1482

ANAND L. DANIELL,
Appellant,
v.
MICHAEL VUKOSA, Individually on behalf Himself and All
Others Similarly Situated; MICHAEL JOSENHANS, Individually
on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated;
ROBERT COLLIER, Individually on behalf of himself and all
others similarly situated; SALLY LEBOW,
Plaintiffs – Appellees,
and
SOURCEFIRE, INC.; JOHN C. BECKER; MARTIN F. ROESCH; STEVEN
R. POLK; TIM A. GULERI; MICHAEL CRISTINZIANO; ARNOLD L.
PUNARO; CHARLES E. PETERS, JR.; KEVIN M. KLAUSMEYER; CISCO
SYSTEMS,
INCORPORATED;
SHASTA
ACQUISITION
CORP.;
ACQUISITION CORP.,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Marvin J. Garbis, Senior District
Judge.
(1:13-cv-02271-JFM; 1:13-cv-02332-JFM; 1:13-cv-02377JFM; 1:13-cv-02483-JKB)

Submitted:

October 31, 2014

Decided:

November 19, 2014

Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Appeal: 14-1482

Doc: 23

Filed: 11/19/2014

Pg: 2 of 3

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anand L. Daniell, Appellant Pro Se.
Edward B. Gerard, Stephen
J. Oddo, Justin D. Rieger, ROBBINS ARROYO LLP, San Diego,
California; Patrick Charles Smith, DEHAY & ELLISTON, LLP,
Baltimore, Maryland; Yelena Trepetin, Charles J. Piven, Charles
Noah Insler, BROWER PIVEN, Stevenson, Maryland; Evan J. Smith,
BRODSKY & SMITH, LLC, Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania; Mark D. Gately,
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP, Baltimore, Maryland; Joseph K. Kanada,
Erik Jeffrey Olson, MORRISON & FOERSTER, LLP, Palo Alto,
California; Thomas Matthew Buchanan, WINSTON & STRAWN, LLP,
Washington, D.C.; J. Erik Connolly, Robert L. Michels, Dan K.
Webb, Andrew J. Yahkind, WINSTON & STRAWN, LLP, Chicago,
Illinois, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 14-1482

Doc: 23

Filed: 11/19/2014

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Anand L. Daniell appeals the district court’s order
certifying a class for a class action complaint and approving a
settlement agreement, thereby overruling Daniell’s objection to
the

settlement.

We

reversible error.

have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court.

Daniell v. Vukosa, Nos. 1:13-cv-02271-

JFM; 1:13-cv-02332-JFM; 1:13-cv-02377-JFM; 1:13-cv-02483-JKB (D.
Md. Apr. 18, 2014).
facts

and

materials

legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the

contentions

are

adequately

this

and

argument

court

presented

would

not

in

the

aid

the

decisional process.
AFFIRMED

3