Ryan McFadyen v. Linwood Wilson

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999371445-2] Originating case number: 1:07-cv-00953-JAB-JEP Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999468596].. [14-1499]

Appeal: 14-1499

Doc: 20

Filed: 11/04/2014

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1499

RYAN MCFADYEN; MATTHEW WILSON; BRECK ARCHER,
Plaintiffs – Appellees,
v.
LINWOOD E. WILSON,
Defendant – Appellant,
and
DUKE UNIVERSITY; DUKE UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPT.; AARON
GRAVES; ROBERT DEAN; LEILA HUMPHRIES; PHYLLIS COOPER;
WILLIAM F. GARBER, III; JAMES SCHWAB; JOSEPH FLEMING;
JEFFREY O. BEST; GARY N. SMITH; GREG STOTSENBERG; ROBERT K.
STEEL; RICHARD H. BRODHEAD, PHD; PETER LANGE, PHD; TALLMAN
TRASK, III, PHD; JOHN BURNESS; LARRY MONETA, ED.D.; DUKE
UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEMS; PRIVATE DIAGNOSTIC CLINIC,
P.L.L.C.; JULIE MANLY, M.D.; THERESA ARICO, R.N.; TARA
LEVICY, R.N.; CITY OF DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA; MICHAEL B.
NIFONG; PATRICK BAKER; STEVEN CHALMERS; RONALD HODGE; LEE
RUSS; STEPHEN MIHAICH; BEVERLY COUNCIL; EDWARD SARVIS; JEFF
LAMB; MICHAEL RIPBERGER; LAIRD EVANS; JAMES T. SOUKUP;
KAMMIE MICHAEL; DAVID W. ADDISON; MARK D. GOTTLIEB;
BENJAMIN W. HIMAN; RICHARD D. CLAYTON; DNA SECURITY, INC.;
RICHARD CLARK; BRIAN MEEHAN, PHD; VICTOR J. DZAU, M.D.;
ALLISON HALTON; KEMEL DAWKINS; SUZANNE WASIOLEK; STEPHEN
BRYAN; MATTHEW DRUMMOND; DUKE POLICE DEFENDANTS,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr.,
Senior District Judge. (1:07-cv-00953-JAB-JEP)

Appeal: 14-1499

Doc: 20

Submitted:

Filed: 11/04/2014

Pg: 2 of 3

October 30, 2014

Decided:

November 4, 2014

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Linwood Wilson, Appellant Pro Se.
Robert Christopher Ekstrand,
Stefanie Anne Smith, EKSTRAND & EKSTRAND, LLP, Durham, North
Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 14-1499

Doc: 20

Filed: 11/04/2014

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Linwood Wilson seeks to appeal the district court’s
order dismissing two claims against him and denying his motion
for sanctions.

This court may exercise jurisdiction only over

final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory
and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P.
54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 54546 (1949).

Because the order did not dispose of all claims

against all parties, it is not a final order.
Parke-Davis
curiam).
order.

&

Co.,

685

F.2d

912,

913

(4th

See Robinson v.
Cir.

1982)

(per

Nor is it an appealable interlocutory or collateral
Accordingly, we deny appellant's motion to proceed in

forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
We

dispense

contentions

with
are

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the

facts

and

the

materials

legal
before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

3