Richard W. Mann v. European American Investment
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:11-cv-00516-JAB-JLW Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999470538].. [14-1503]
Appeal: 14-1503
Doc: 21
Filed: 11/06/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1503
RICHARD W. MANN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
EUROPEAN AMERICAN INVESTMENT BANK AG,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr.,
Senior District Judge. (1:11-cv-00516-JAB-JLW)
Submitted:
October 31, 2014
Decided:
November 6, 2014
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Raymond A. Knight, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellant.
Timothy G. Barber, Antonio E. Lewis, KING & SPALDING, LLP,
Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-1503
Doc: 21
Filed: 11/06/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Richard
W.
Mann
appeals
the
district
accepting
the
recommendation
of
the
dismissing
the
case
of
personal
appeal,
we
confine
for
our
lack
review
to
court’s
magistrate
the
order
judge
and
jurisdiction.
On
issues
raised
in
the
Appellant’s brief.
See Fed. R. App. P. 28(a)(8); Edwards v.
City
178
of
Goldsboro,
(stating
failure
abandonment
of
Appellant’s
brief
magistrate
to
appeal).
judge’s
were
F.3d
231,
comply
241
with
None
raised
of
n.6
this
the
in
recommendation.
(4th
rule
theories
his
Therefore,
Midgette, 478 F.3d 616, 620-22 (4th Cir. 2007).
1999)
constitutes
asserted
objections
waived appellate review of these arguments.
affirm the district court’s judgment.
Cir.
to
Appellant
in
the
has
United States v.
Accordingly, we
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?