Richard W. Mann v. European American Investment

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:11-cv-00516-JAB-JLW Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999470538].. [14-1503]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-1503 Doc: 21 Filed: 11/06/2014 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1503 RICHARD W. MANN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. EUROPEAN AMERICAN INVESTMENT BANK AG, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:11-cv-00516-JAB-JLW) Submitted: October 31, 2014 Decided: November 6, 2014 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Raymond A. Knight, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellant. Timothy G. Barber, Antonio E. Lewis, KING & SPALDING, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-1503 Doc: 21 Filed: 11/06/2014 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Richard W. Mann appeals the district accepting the recommendation of the dismissing the case of personal appeal, we confine for our lack review to court’s magistrate the order judge and jurisdiction. On issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See Fed. R. App. P. 28(a)(8); Edwards v. City 178 of Goldsboro, (stating failure abandonment of Appellant’s brief magistrate to appeal). judge’s were F.3d 231, comply 241 with None raised of n.6 this the in recommendation. (4th rule theories his Therefore, Midgette, 478 F.3d 616, 620-22 (4th Cir. 2007). 1999) constitutes asserted objections waived appellate review of these arguments. affirm the district court’s judgment. Cir. to Appellant in the has United States v. Accordingly, we We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?