Sharon Adams v. Carolyn Colvin
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:13-cv-00019-FDW-DSC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999634573].. [14-1555]
Appeal: 14-1555
Doc: 36
Filed: 08/05/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1555
SHARON RADFORD ADAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CAROLYN
W.
COLVIN,
Administration,
Commissioner
of
Social
Security
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Bryson City.
Frank D. Whitney,
Chief District Judge. (2:13-cv-00019-FDW-DSC)
Submitted:
June 30, 2015
Decided:
August 5, 2015
Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edward Wicklund, Paul B. Eaglin, OLINSKY LAW GROUP, Syracuse,
New York, for Appellant.
Anne M. Tompkins, United States
Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina; Paul B. Taylor, Assistant
United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina; Jeanne D.
Semivan, Special Assistant United States Attorney, SOCIAL
SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Boston, Massachusetts, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-1555
Doc: 36
Filed: 08/05/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Sharon Radford Adams appeals the district court’s orders
denying her initial petition to proceed in forma pauperis and
upholding
the
Commissioner’s
denial
of
her
application
for
disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income.
We
have
reviewed
the
Accordingly, we affirm.
record
and
find
no
reversible
Adams v. Colvin, No. 2:13-cv-00019-FDW-
DSC (W.D.N.C. Apr. 26, 2013 & May 1, 2014).
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
error.
the
the
facts
and
materials
legal
before
We dispense with
contentions
this
court
are
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?