H. Austin v. Douglas Peterson & Associate

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:13-cv-00877-BO Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999457882]. Mailed to: Austin. [14-1578]

Appeal: 14-1578

Doc: 10

Filed: 10/20/2014

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1578

H. RICHARD AUSTIN, St. Louis, Missouri,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DOUGLAS G. PETERSON & ASSOCIATES, Greenfield, Massachusetts;
STEPHEN W. HOUGHTON, Greenfield, Massachusetts; JIMMY PAU,
Cary, North Carolina,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:13-cv-00877-BO)

Submitted:

October 16, 2014

Decided:

October 20, 2014

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

H. Richard Austin, Appellant Pro Se.
George L. Goodridge,
CURTISS, CAREY, GATES, GRAVES & GOODRIDGE, LLP, Greenfield,
Massachusetts; Paul Marshall Yoder, WHARTON ALDHIZER & WEAVER,
PLC, Harrisonburg, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-1578

Doc: 10

Filed: 10/20/2014

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
H. Richard Austin appeals from the district court’s
order dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
60(d)(3) against Defendants.

We have reviewed the record and

find

Accordingly,

no

reversible

error.

reasons stated by the district court.
Peterson
2014).
legal
before

&

Assocs.,

No.

we

affirm

for

the

Austin v. Douglas G.

5:13-cv-00877-BO

(E.D.N.C.

May

12,

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2