Kim Williams v. Kettler Management Inc.
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999456551-2] Originating case number: 8:12-cv-01226-CBD Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999583178]. Mailed to: Kim Williams. [14-1610]
Appeal: 14-1610
Doc: 43
Filed: 05/14/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1610
KIM WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
KETTLER MANAGEMENT INC.; AIMCO PROPERTIES, LP,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Charles B. Day, Magistrate Judge.
(8:12-cv-01226-CBD)
Submitted:
March 31, 2015
Decided:
May 14, 2015
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kim Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Lauri E. Cleary, Michael John
Neary, LERCH, EARLY & BREWER, CHARTERED, Bethesda, Maryland;
Steven G. Metzger, Mark S. Saudek, GALLAGHER EVELIUS & JONES,
LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-1610
Doc: 43
Filed: 05/14/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Kim Williams appeals the magistrate judge’s order granting
the
summary
judgment
motions
of
Kettler
Management,
Inc.
(“Kettler”) and AIMCO Properties, L.P. (“AIMCO”) on his claims
under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.
§ 2000e et seq. (2012), Md. Code. Ann., State Gov’t § 20-601 et
seq. (West 2015), and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (2012), and Kettler’s
counterclaim
for
breach
of
contract.
record and find no reversible error.
We
have
reviewed
the
Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the magistrate judge.
Williams v. Kettler
Mgmt. Inc., No. 8:12-cv-01226-CBD (D. Md. June 11, 2014).
We deny Williams’s motion to appoint counsel.
We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before us and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?