Kim Williams v. Kettler Management Inc.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999456551-2] Originating case number: 8:12-cv-01226-CBD Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999583178]. Mailed to: Kim Williams. [14-1610]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-1610 Doc: 43 Filed: 05/14/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1610 KIM WILLIAMS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. KETTLER MANAGEMENT INC.; AIMCO PROPERTIES, LP, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Charles B. Day, Magistrate Judge. (8:12-cv-01226-CBD) Submitted: March 31, 2015 Decided: May 14, 2015 Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kim Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Lauri E. Cleary, Michael John Neary, LERCH, EARLY & BREWER, CHARTERED, Bethesda, Maryland; Steven G. Metzger, Mark S. Saudek, GALLAGHER EVELIUS & JONES, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-1610 Doc: 43 Filed: 05/14/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Kim Williams appeals the magistrate judge’s order granting the summary judgment motions of Kettler Management, Inc. (“Kettler”) and AIMCO Properties, L.P. (“AIMCO”) on his claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (2012), Md. Code. Ann., State Gov’t § 20-601 et seq. (West 2015), and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (2012), and Kettler’s counterclaim for breach of contract. record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed the Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Williams v. Kettler Mgmt. Inc., No. 8:12-cv-01226-CBD (D. Md. June 11, 2014). We deny Williams’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before us and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?