Pamela Bond v. SSA

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for other relief [999427336-2] Originating case number: 4:13-cv-00046-JLK-JCH. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999480723]. Mailed to: P. Bond. [14-1629]

Appeal: 14-1629

Doc: 12

Filed: 11/24/2014

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1629

PAMELA SUE BOND,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Danville.
Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
District Judge. (4:13-cv-00046-JLK-JCH)

Submitted:

November 20, 2014

Decided:

November 24, 2014

Before KING and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Pamela Sue Bond, Appellant Pro Se. Maija DiDomenico, Assistant
Regional
Counsel,
David
Lance
Leach,
SOCIAL
SECURITY
ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-1629

Doc: 12

Filed: 11/24/2014

Pg: 2 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Pamela

Sue

Bond

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

dismissing the civil action Bond brought regarding her ongoing
attempts to obtain Social Security disability benefits.

The

district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant
to

28

U.S.C.

recommended

§ 636(b)(1)(B)

dismissing

jurisdiction

and

the

(2012).

advised

case
Bond

for
that

The
lack

magistrate
of

subject

failure

to

judge
matter

file

timely

objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review
of a district court order based on the recommendation.
The
magistrate

timely

judge’s

filing

of

recommendation

specific
is

objections

necessary

to

to

a

preserve

appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when
the

parties

have

noncompliance.

been

warned

of

the

consequences

Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th

Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985).
has

waived

objections

of

appellate
after

review

receiving

by

proper

failing
notice.

to

file

Bond

specific

Accordingly,

we

affirm the judgment of the district court.

We deny the pending

motion

Retirement

for

clarification

of

the

Early

Benefit

previously awarded to Bond.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal

contentions

are

adequately

2

presented

in

the

materials

Appeal: 14-1629

before

Doc: 12

this

court

Filed: 11/24/2014

and

Pg: 3 of 3

argument

would

not

aid

the

decisional

process.
AFFIRMED

3