Dawn Martin v. Johannes Brondum
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:11-cv-01118-AJT-TCB. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999907710]. [14-1644]
Appeal: 14-1644
Doc: 69
Filed: 08/10/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1644
DAWN V. MARTIN; MIGUEL GALLARDO,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
JOHANNES BRONDUM; LONG AND FOSTER REAL ESTATE, INC.; LONG AND
FOSTER COMPANIES; LONG AND FOSTER REALTORS; PATRICIA KNIGHT,
a/k/a Patricia Knight Lambert; SUSAN HAUGHTON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony J. Trenga, District
Judge. (1:11-cv-01118-AJT-TCB)
Submitted:
July 29, 2016
Decided:
August 10, 2016
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dawn V. Martin, LAW OFFICES OF DAWN V. MARTIN, Washington, D.C.,
for Appellants.
Susan F. Earman, FRIEDLANDER, FRIEDLANDER &
EARMAN, PC, McLean, Virginia; Mikhael D. Charnoff, PERRY CHARNOFF
PLLC, Arlington, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-1644
Doc: 69
Filed: 08/10/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Dawn V. Martin and Miguel Gallardo appeal the district court’s
order denying their Fed. R. Civ. Rule 60(b) motion challenging the
taxation
of
costs
and
denying
their
photographs by electronic means.
find no reversible error.
request
to
submit
color
We have reviewed the record and
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court.
Martin v. Brondum, No. 1:11-cv-
01118-AJT-TCB (E.D. Va. May 29, 2014).
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?