Dawn Martin v. Johannes Brondum

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:11-cv-01118-AJT-TCB. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999907710]. [14-1644]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-1644 Doc: 69 Filed: 08/10/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1644 DAWN V. MARTIN; MIGUEL GALLARDO, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. JOHANNES BRONDUM; LONG AND FOSTER REAL ESTATE, INC.; LONG AND FOSTER COMPANIES; LONG AND FOSTER REALTORS; PATRICIA KNIGHT, a/k/a Patricia Knight Lambert; SUSAN HAUGHTON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony J. Trenga, District Judge. (1:11-cv-01118-AJT-TCB) Submitted: July 29, 2016 Decided: August 10, 2016 Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dawn V. Martin, LAW OFFICES OF DAWN V. MARTIN, Washington, D.C., for Appellants. Susan F. Earman, FRIEDLANDER, FRIEDLANDER & EARMAN, PC, McLean, Virginia; Mikhael D. Charnoff, PERRY CHARNOFF PLLC, Arlington, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-1644 Doc: 69 Filed: 08/10/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Dawn V. Martin and Miguel Gallardo appeal the district court’s order denying their Fed. R. Civ. Rule 60(b) motion challenging the taxation of costs and denying their photographs by electronic means. find no reversible error. request to submit color We have reviewed the record and Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Martin v. Brondum, No. 1:11-cv- 01118-AJT-TCB (E.D. Va. May 29, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?