Vera Charlot v. Michael Donley

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:11-cv-00579-MBS. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999524130]. Mailed to: Vera Charlot. [14-1650]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-1650 Doc: 8 Filed: 02/05/2015 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1650 VERA SHEPARD CHARLOT, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. HONORABLE MICHAEL B. DONLEY, Secretary of the Air Force, Defendant – Appellee, and TERRY ST. PETER; DAWN M. MOORE; CLAYTON D. LEISHMAN; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior District Judge. (3:11-cv-00579-MBS) Submitted: January 9, 2015 Decided: February 5, 2015 Before WILKINSON and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Vera Shepard Charlot, Appellant Pro Se. Terri Hearn Bailey, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Appeal: 14-1650 Doc: 8 Filed: 02/05/2015 Pg: 2 of 3 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 14-1650 Doc: 8 Filed: 02/05/2015 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Vera Shepard Charlot appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to Defendants in this action alleging defamation and multiple violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record and Accordingly, reasons stated by the district court. we affirm for the Charlot v. Donley, No. 3:11-cv-00579-MBS (D.S.C. Mar. 29 & Sept. 30, 2013; Mar. 31, 2014). legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?