Vera Charlot v. Michael Donley
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:11-cv-00579-MBS. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999524130]. Mailed to: Vera Charlot. [14-1650]
Appeal: 14-1650
Doc: 8
Filed: 02/05/2015
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1650
VERA SHEPARD CHARLOT,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
HONORABLE MICHAEL B. DONLEY, Secretary of the Air Force,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
TERRY ST. PETER; DAWN M. MOORE; CLAYTON D. LEISHMAN; UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia.
Margaret B. Seymour, Senior
District Judge. (3:11-cv-00579-MBS)
Submitted:
January 9, 2015
Decided:
February 5, 2015
Before WILKINSON and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vera Shepard Charlot, Appellant Pro Se. Terri Hearn Bailey,
Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Appeal: 14-1650
Doc: 8
Filed: 02/05/2015
Pg: 2 of 3
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 14-1650
Doc: 8
Filed: 02/05/2015
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Vera
Shepard
Charlot
appeals
the
district
court’s
orders accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and
granting summary judgment to Defendants in this action alleging
defamation and multiple violations of Title VII of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964, as amended.
find
no
reversible
error.
We have reviewed the record and
Accordingly,
reasons stated by the district court.
we
affirm
for
the
Charlot v. Donley, No.
3:11-cv-00579-MBS (D.S.C. Mar. 29 & Sept. 30, 2013; Mar. 31,
2014).
legal
before
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?