Mike Willoughby v. Henrico County

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:14-cv-00223-HEH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999458036].. [14-1673]

Appeal: 14-1673

Doc: 16

Filed: 10/20/2014

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1673

MIKE WILLOUGHBY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HENRICO COUNTY;
COMMONWEALTH OF
ATTORNEY OFFICE,

OWEN I. ASHMAN; LEE A. HARRIS, JR.;
VIRGINIA; HENRICO COUNTY COMMONWEALTH'S

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:14-cv-00223-HEH)

Submitted:

October 16, 2014

Decided:

October 20, 2014

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mike Willoughby, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Ramsey Newby, OFFICE
OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY, Henrico, Virginia; Sherry A. Fox,
THOMPSON MCMULLAN PC, Richmond, Virginia; Erin Rose McNeill,
Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-1673

Doc: 16

Filed: 10/20/2014

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Mike

Willoughby

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

denying relief on his complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 12132 (2012),
42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012), and state negligence law.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

We have

Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

See

Willoughby

Va.

v.

Henrico

June 27, 2014).
facts

and

materials

legal
before

Cnty.,

No.

3:14-cv-00223-HEH

(E.D.

We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions

are

adequately

this

and

argument

court

presented

would

not

in

the

aid

the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2