In re: Detrine Hudson

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999393891-2], denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999393841-2] Originating case number: 0:13-cv-03075-RMG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999478763].. [14-1685]

Appeal: 14-1685

Doc: 11

Filed: 11/20/2014

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1685

In Re: DETRINE HUDSON,
Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(0:13-cv-03075-RMG)

Submitted:

November 17, 2014

Decided:

November 20, 2014

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Detrine Hudson, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-1685

Doc: 11

Filed: 11/20/2014

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Detrine
mandamus,

Hudson

alleging

the

has

filed

district

petitions
court

for

has

a

unduly

writ

of

delayed

processing a notice of appeal he filed in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2012) action.

He seeks an order from this court directing the

district

to

court

act.

Our

review

of

the

district

court’s

docket reveals that the district court docketed the notice of
appeal and forwarded it to this court.

Accordingly, because the

district

we

court

has

petitions as moot.
facts

and

materials

legal
before

recently

acted,

deny

the

mandamus

We dispense with oral argument because the

contentions

are

adequately

this

and

argument

court

presented

would

not

in

the

aid

the

decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

2