Susan Breed v. Carolyn Colvin
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:10-cv-00583-NCT-JLW. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999524823]. [14-1709]
Appeal: 14-1709
Doc: 30
Filed: 02/06/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1709
SUSAN E. BREED,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro.
N. Carlton Tilley,
Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:10-cv-00583-NCT-JLW)
Submitted:
January 29, 2015
Decided:
February 6, 2015
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David J. Cortes, ROBERTI, WITTENBERG, LAUFFER, WICKER & CINSKI,
Durham, North Carolina, for Appellant.
Ripley Rand, United
States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, John J. Engel,
Special Assistant United States Attorney, SOCIAL SECURITY
ADMINISTRATION, Boston, Massachusetts, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-1709
Doc: 30
Filed: 02/06/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Susan
accepting
the
E.
Breed
appeals
recommendation
of
the
district
the
court’s
magistrate
order
judge
and
entering judgment for the Commissioner in this action seeking
disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income.
We
have
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
reversible
error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.
Breed
May 14, 2014).
v.
Colvin,
No.
1:10-cv-00583-NCT-JLW
(M.D.N.C.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before
this
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?