Vicki Sampson v. Sheppard Pratt Hospital
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:12-cv-00204-WMN. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999444569]. Mailed to: Vicki Sampson. [14-1718]
Appeal: 14-1718
Doc: 14
Filed: 09/29/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1718
VICKI SAMPSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SHEPPARD PRATT HOSPITAL AT ELLICOTT CITY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
William M. Nickerson, Senior District
Judge. (1:12-cv-00204-WMN)
Submitted:
September 25, 2014
Decided:
September 29, 2014
Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vicki Sampson, Appellant Pro Se.
Thomas Graham Coale, Amy B.
Heinrich, GOODELL DEVRIES LEECH & DANN, LLP, Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-1718
Doc: 14
Filed: 09/29/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Vicki
denying
her
Sampson
motion
to
appeals
the
reconsider
district
the
complaint for lack of jurisdiction.
court’s
dismissal
of
her
R.
34(b).
challenge
the
Because
basis
for
Sampson’s
the
civil
On appeal, we confine our
review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief.
Cir.
order
informal
district
brief
court’s
See 4th
does
not
disposition,
Sampson has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. *
Accordingly,
dispense
we
with
contentions
are
affirm
oral
the
district
argument
adequately
court’s
because
presented
in
the
the
judgment.
facts
We
and
legal
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
To the extent Sampson seeks to appeal the district court’s
February 23, 2012, order dismissing her complaint and the
court’s February 27, 2013, order denying a temporary restraining
order, her appeal of those orders is untimely. See Fed. R. App.
P. 4(a)(1).
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?