Andres Glenn v. Lize Stowe

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:14-cv-01580-CMC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999478854]. Mailed to: Glenn. [14-1725]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-1725 Doc: 14 Filed: 11/20/2014 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1725 ANDRES LEROY GLENN, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. LIZE STOWE; ELIBETH EZACK; SUE GALE; MICHELL MOORE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (3:14-cv-01580-CMC) Submitted: November 18, 2014 Decided: November 20, 2014 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Andres Leroy Glenn, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-1725 Doc: 14 Filed: 11/20/2014 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Andres Leroy Glenn seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing his civil action without prejudice. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). seeks to appeal is neither a final order The order Glenn nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order, as Glenn may be able to save the action by amending his complaint to cure deficiencies identified by the district court. the pleading See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). jurisdiction. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?