Sirina Sucklal v. Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case numbers: 1:14-cv-00039-JFM,13-28091,13-00691. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999486945]. [14-1729]

Appeal: 14-1729

Doc: 24

Filed: 12/04/2014

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1729

SIRINA SUCKLAL,
Debtor - Appellant,
v.
GOLDMAN SACHS MORTGAGE COMPANY,
Creditor – Appellee,
NANCY SPENCER GRIGSBY,
Trustee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
Judge. (1:14-cv-00039-JFM)

Submitted:

November 25, 2014

Decided:

December 4, 2014

Before WILKINSON and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sirina Sucklal, Appellant Pro Se.
MORRIS
HARDWICK
SCHNEIDER,
LLC,
Appellee.

Gregory Christopher Mullen,
Baltimore,
Maryland,
for

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-1729

Doc: 24

Filed: 12/04/2014

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Sirina Sucklal appeals from the district court’s order
dismissing as moot her appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order
lifting the automatic stay and allowing the sale of her real
property.

We have reviewed the record and find no error in the

bankruptcy court’s decision.

See In re Frushour, 433 F.3d 393,

398 (4th Cir. 2005) (noting that, in an appeal from the district
court sitting as an appellate court from a bankruptcy court, we
“review

directly

the

Accordingly, we affirm.

bankruptcy

court’s

decision”).

We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials

before

this

court

and

argument

would

not

aid

the

decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2