Andres Leroy Glenn v. Gwen Richardson

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:14-cv-01147-CMC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999442843]. Mailed to: Glenn. [14-1739]

Appeal: 14-1739

Doc: 7

Filed: 09/25/2014

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1739

ANDRES LEROY GLENN,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
GWEN RICHARDSON,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia.
Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior
District Judge. (3:14-cv-01147-CMC)

Submitted:

September 23, 2014

Before NIEMEYER and
Senior Circuit Judge.

GREGORY,

Decided:

Circuit

September 25, 2014

Judges,

and

HAMILTON,

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andres Leroy Glenn, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-1739

Doc: 7

Filed: 09/25/2014

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Andres

Leroy

Glenn

seeks

to

appeal

the

district

court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to
dismiss without prejudice Glenn’s civil complaint.

We dismiss

the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal
was not timely filed.
Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of
the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal,
Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends
the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the
appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).

“[T]he timely

filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional
requirement.”

Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket
on May 19, 2014.

The notice of appeal was filed on July 22,

2014, sixty-four days later.

Because Glenn failed to file a

timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening
of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal.
oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

materials

legal
before

We dispense with
contentions
this

court

are
and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2