In re: Salvador Cabrera
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion dispositions in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999404436-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999411731-2]. Originating case numbers: 1:09-cr-00122-WO-1, 1:12-cv-00667-WO-JLW, 1:09-cr-00323-WO-1, 1:12-cv-00695-WO-JLW. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999485950]. Mailed to: Petitioner. [14-1751]
Appeal: 14-1751
Doc: 6
Filed: 12/03/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1751
In Re: SALVADOR SANTANA CABRERA,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(1:09-cr-00122-WO-1; 1:12-cv-00667-WO-JLW;
1:09-cr-00323-WO-1; 1:12-cv-00695-WO-JLW)
Submitted:
November 24, 2014
Decided:
December 3, 2014
Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Salvador Santana Cabrera, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-1751
Doc: 6
Filed: 12/03/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Salvador
Santana
Cabrera
petitions
for
a
writ
of
mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting
on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motions.
He seeks an order from
this court directing the district court to act.
Our review of
the district court’s docket reveals that the district court has
dismissed both motions.
has
recently
decided
Accordingly, because the district court
Cabrera’s
case,
we
deny
the
mandamus
petition as moot.
We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis.
We
oral
dispense
contentions
with
are
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
facts
and
the
materials
legal
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?