Mary Button v. Kevin Chumney

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-00232-IMK-JSK Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999680271].. [14-1752, 14-1777]

Appeal: 14-1752

Doc: 52

Filed: 10/19/2015

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1752

MARY LOU BUTTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KEVIN K. CHUMNEY; JANET L.
CHESAPEAKE APPALACHIA, LLC,

CHUMNEY,

husband

and

wife;

Defendants – Appellees,
and
WILLIAM H. GASTON; DIANE MARKET GASTON, husband and wife,
Defendants.

No. 14-1777

MARY LOU BUTTON,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CHESAPEAKE APPALACHIA, LLC,
Defendant – Appellant,
KEVIN K. CHUMNEY; JANET L. CHUMNEY, husband and wife,
Defendants – Appellees,
and

Appeal: 14-1752

Doc: 52

Filed: 10/19/2015

Pg: 2 of 3

WILLIAM H. GASTON; DIANE MARKET GASTON, husband and wife,
Defendants.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg.
Irene M. Keeley,
District Judge. (1:13-cv-00232-IMK-JSK)

Submitted:

September 29, 2015

Decided:

October 19, 2015

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

No. 14-1752 affirmed; No. 14-1777 dismissed by unpublished per
curiam opinion.

George B. Armistead, BAKER & ARMISTEAD, PLLC, Morgantown, West
Virginia, for Appellant/Cross-Appellee Mary Lou Button. John B.
Brooks, LAW OFFICE OF JOHN B. BROOKS, PLLC, Morgantown, West
Virginia, for Appellees Kevin K. Chumney and Janet L. Chumney.
W. Henry Lawrence, IV, Amy Marie Smith, Lauren Alise Williams,
STEPTOE
&
JOHNSON
PLLC,
Bridgeport,
West
Virginia,
for
Appellee/Cross-Appellant Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 14-1752

Doc: 52

Filed: 10/19/2015

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Mary Lou Button appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment to Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC (“Chesapeake”),
but denying Chesapeake’s cross-claim, in Button’s civil action
regarding the tax foreclosure sale of her property.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

We have

Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
v.

Chumney,

2014).

No.

1:13-cv-00232-IMK-JSK

(N.D.

W.

Va.

Button

June

27,

Because we affirm the district court’s grant of summary

judgment, we dismiss as moot Chesapeake’s cross-appeal of the
same order.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before

this

court

and

argument

would

not

aid

the

decisional

process.
No. 14-1752 AFFIRMED
No. 14-1777 DISMISSED

3