Alexander Stewart v. Department of the Navy

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:14-cv-00071-MSD-TEM. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999457887]. Mailed to: appellant. [14-1754]

Appeal: 14-1754

Doc: 6

Filed: 10/20/2014

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1754

ALEXANDER S. STEWART,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Mark S. Davis, District
Judge. (4:14-cv-00071-MSD-TEM)

Submitted:

October 16, 2014

Decided:

October 20, 2014

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alexander S. Stewart, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-1754

Doc: 6

Filed: 10/20/2014

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Alexander
order

dismissing

S.

Stewart

without

appeals

prejudice

the

his

district

civil

court’s

complaint

frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 5 1915(e)(2)(i) (2012). *
have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

as
We

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.
(E.D.

Stewart v. Dep’t of the Navy, No. 4:14-cv-00071-MSD-TEM
Va.

dispense

filed
with

contentions

are

July
oral

7,

2014

argument

adequately

&

entered

because

presented

in

July

the
the

8,

facts

2014).

We

and

legal

materials

before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

We conclude that the order is final and appealable as no
amendment to the complaint could cure the defects identified by
the district court.
See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers
Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066–67 (4th Cir. 1993).

2