Orly Taitz v. Carolyn Colvin
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-01878-ELH. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999481806]. Mailed to: Orly Taitz. [14-1773]
Appeal: 14-1773
Doc: 12
Filed: 11/25/2014
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1773
ORLY TAITZ,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
and
DEFEND OUR FREEDOMS FOUNDATION,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN
COLVIN,
Administration,
Commissioner
of
the
Social
Security
Defendant – Appellee,
and
SSA NOTIFY,
Party-in-Interest.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge.
(1:13-cv-01878-ELH)
Submitted:
November 21, 2014
Decided:
November 25, 2014
Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Appeal: 14-1773
Doc: 12
Filed: 11/25/2014
Pg: 2 of 3
Orly Taitz, Appellant Pro Se. Molissa Heather Farber, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Allen F. Loucks, Assistant United
States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 14-1773
Doc: 12
Filed: 11/25/2014
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Orly
Taitz
appeals
the
district
court’s
orders
granting summary judgment to Defendant in this action alleging
failure to comply with a Freedom of Information Act request;
denying Taitz’s motion to reconsider; and denying her motion to
reopen and recuse.
reversible error.
We have reviewed the record and find no
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court.
Taitz v. Colvin, No. 1:13-cv-01878-ELH
(D.
June
Md.
dispense
May
13,
with
contentions
are
2014;
oral
argument
adequately
13,
2014;
because
presented
in
July
the
the
25,
2014).
We
facts
and
legal
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?