Orly Taitz v. Carolyn Colvin

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-01878-ELH. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999481806]. Mailed to: Orly Taitz. [14-1773]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-1773 Doc: 12 Filed: 11/25/2014 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1773 ORLY TAITZ, Plaintiff – Appellant, and DEFEND OUR FREEDOMS FOUNDATION, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN COLVIN, Administration, Commissioner of the Social Security Defendant – Appellee, and SSA NOTIFY, Party-in-Interest. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (1:13-cv-01878-ELH) Submitted: November 21, 2014 Decided: November 25, 2014 Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Appeal: 14-1773 Doc: 12 Filed: 11/25/2014 Pg: 2 of 3 Orly Taitz, Appellant Pro Se. Molissa Heather Farber, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Allen F. Loucks, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 14-1773 Doc: 12 Filed: 11/25/2014 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Orly Taitz appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment to Defendant in this action alleging failure to comply with a Freedom of Information Act request; denying Taitz’s motion to reconsider; and denying her motion to reopen and recuse. reversible error. We have reviewed the record and find no Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Taitz v. Colvin, No. 1:13-cv-01878-ELH (D. June Md. dispense May 13, with contentions are 2014; oral argument adequately 13, 2014; because presented in July the the 25, 2014). We facts and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?