Stephen Gilley v. Securities and Exchange Comm
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-00916-WO,12-11443,12-02066 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999510438].. [14-1775]
Appeal: 14-1775
Doc: 16
Filed: 01/14/2015
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1775
STEPHEN K. GILLEY,
Debtor - Appellant,
v.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
Creditor – Appellee,
GERALD S. SCHAFER,
Trustee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro.
William L. Osteen,
Jr., Chief District Judge.
(1:13-cv-00916-WO; 12-11443; 1202066)
Submitted:
December 31, 2014
Before MOTZ and
Circuit Judge.
HARRIS,
Circuit
Decided:
Judges,
and
January 14, 2015
DAVIS,
Senior
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sophia L. Harvey, LIAO HARVEY PC, Winston-Salem, North Carolina,
for Appellant.
Anne K. Small, General Counsel, Michael A.
Conley, Deputy General Counsel, Jacob H. Stillman, Solicitor,
Tracey A. Hardin, Assistant General Counsel, Morgan Bradylyons,
Appeal: 14-1775
Doc: 16
Filed: 01/14/2015
Pg: 2 of 3
Bankruptcy
Counsel,
SECURITIES
Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
AND
EXCHANGE
COMMISSION,
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 14-1775
Doc: 16
Filed: 01/14/2015
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Stephen K. Gilley appeals the district court’s order
affirming
the
disgorgement
bankruptcy
debt
was
§ 523(a)(19) (2012).
reversible error.
court’s
order
finding
nondischargeable
that
under
Gilley’s
11
U.S.C.
We have reviewed the record and find no
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court.
Gilley v. Sec. & Exch. Comm’n, No. 1:13-
cv-00916-WO; 12-11443; 12-02066 (M.D.N.C. June 3, 2014).
dispense
with
contentions
are
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
We
and
legal
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?