Stephen Gilley v. Securities and Exchange Comm

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-00916-WO,12-11443,12-02066 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999510438].. [14-1775]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-1775 Doc: 16 Filed: 01/14/2015 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1775 STEPHEN K. GILLEY, Debtor - Appellant, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Creditor – Appellee, GERALD S. SCHAFER, Trustee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:13-cv-00916-WO; 12-11443; 1202066) Submitted: December 31, 2014 Before MOTZ and Circuit Judge. HARRIS, Circuit Decided: Judges, and January 14, 2015 DAVIS, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sophia L. Harvey, LIAO HARVEY PC, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellant. Anne K. Small, General Counsel, Michael A. Conley, Deputy General Counsel, Jacob H. Stillman, Solicitor, Tracey A. Hardin, Assistant General Counsel, Morgan Bradylyons, Appeal: 14-1775 Doc: 16 Filed: 01/14/2015 Pg: 2 of 3 Bankruptcy Counsel, SECURITIES Washington, D.C., for Appellee. AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 14-1775 Doc: 16 Filed: 01/14/2015 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Stephen K. Gilley appeals the district court’s order affirming the disgorgement bankruptcy debt was § 523(a)(19) (2012). reversible error. court’s order finding nondischargeable that under Gilley’s 11 U.S.C. We have reviewed the record and find no Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gilley v. Sec. & Exch. Comm’n, No. 1:13- cv-00916-WO; 12-11443; 12-02066 (M.D.N.C. June 3, 2014). dispense with contentions are oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts We and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?