Doyle Ham, Jr. v. Department of Public Safety
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for injunctive relief pending appeal (FRAP 8) [999476601-2]. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-03501-JKB. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999516903]. Mailed to: Appellant. [14-1779]
Appeal: 14-1779
Doc: 15
Filed: 01/26/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1779
DOYLE R. HAM, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES;
DAYENA CORCOREN; JOHN WOLFE; JOHN LOTTICH; GARY MAYNARD;
PAULA GREEN-HOLT; CYNTHIA BRISCOE; BRUCE CHAPMAN; BRENDA
SHELL-ELEAZER; RODNEY BURGER; MARGARET CHIPPENDALE; BRIAN
KAUFFMAN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
James K. Bredar, District Judge.
(1:13-cv-03501-JKB)
Submitted:
January 22, 2015
Decided:
January 26, 2015
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Doyle R. Ham, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND,
Appellees.
Judith Ann Barr, OFFICE OF
Pikesville, Maryland, for
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-1779
Doc: 15
Filed: 01/26/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Doyle R. Ham, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his complaint for failing to state a claim.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
We have
Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Ham v.
Dep’t of Pub. Safety & Corr. Servs., No. 1:13-cv-03501-JKB (D.
Md. filed July 10, 2014 & entered July 11, 2014).
Ham’s
motion
for
injunctive
relief.
We
We also deny
dispense
with
oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?