Doyle Ham, Jr. v. Department of Public Safety

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for injunctive relief pending appeal (FRAP 8) [999476601-2]. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-03501-JKB. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999516903]. Mailed to: Appellant. [14-1779]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-1779 Doc: 15 Filed: 01/26/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1779 DOYLE R. HAM, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES; DAYENA CORCOREN; JOHN WOLFE; JOHN LOTTICH; GARY MAYNARD; PAULA GREEN-HOLT; CYNTHIA BRISCOE; BRUCE CHAPMAN; BRENDA SHELL-ELEAZER; RODNEY BURGER; MARGARET CHIPPENDALE; BRIAN KAUFFMAN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge. (1:13-cv-03501-JKB) Submitted: January 22, 2015 Decided: January 26, 2015 Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Doyle R. Ham, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Appellees. Judith Ann Barr, OFFICE OF Pikesville, Maryland, for Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-1779 Doc: 15 Filed: 01/26/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Doyle R. Ham, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for failing to state a claim. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ham v. Dep’t of Pub. Safety & Corr. Servs., No. 1:13-cv-03501-JKB (D. Md. filed July 10, 2014 & entered July 11, 2014). Ham’s motion for injunctive relief. We We also deny dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?