Michael Kennedy v. US
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-00914-CCB. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999498145]. Mailed to: Appellant. [14-1790]
Appeal: 14-1790
Doc: 6
Filed: 12/22/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1790
MICHAEL E. KENNEDY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Catherine C. Blake, Chief District
Judge. (1:14-cv-00914-CCB)
Submitted:
December 18, 2014
Decided:
December 22, 2014
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Edward Kennedy, Appellant Pro Se.
Neil R. White,
Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-1790
Doc: 6
Filed: 12/22/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Michael E. Kennedy appeals the district court’s order
granting
the
United
States’
motion
to
dismiss
for
lack
of
subject matter jurisdiction Kennedy’s complaint alleging a claim
pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-2680
(2012).
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error.
Accordingly, although we modify the dismissal order to
reflect that the dismissal is without prejudice, see S. Walk at
Broadlands Homeowner’s Ass’n, Inc. v. OpenBand at Broadlands,
LLC, 713 F.3d 175, 185 & n.4 (4th Cir. 2013), we affirm the
dismissal as modified.
See 28 U.S.C. § 2106 (2012); MM ex rel.
DM v. Sch. Dist. of Greenville Cnty., 303 F.3d 523, 536 (4th
Cir. 2002).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before
this
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?