Yvett Rudolph v. HR Specialist

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-00477-LMB-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999510457]. Mailed to: appellant. [14-1797]

Appeal: 14-1797

Doc: 11

Filed: 01/14/2015

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1797

YVETT C. RUDOLPH,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
HR SPECIALIST, of Business Management Daily; BUSINESS
MANAGEMENT DAILY, d/b/a Capital Information Group Inc.,
doing business as Capital Information Group Inc.; CAPITAL
INFORMATION
GROUP
INCORPORATED;
ALLIE
P.
ASH,
JR.,
President and Officer Capital Information Group Inc.;
PHILLIP ASH, Vice President, Officer, and Director Capital
Information Group, Publisher for HR Specialist; STEVEN
STURM, Vice President, Officer of Capital Information Group
Inc.; PATRICK DI DOMENICO, Editorial Director Business
Management Daily; ADAM GOLDSTEIN, Associate Publisher
Business Management Daily; WILLIAM H. STURGES, Esquire,
Editor of HR Specialist,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:14-cv-00477-LMB-JFA)

Submitted:

December 22, 2014

Decided:

January 14, 2015

Before GREGORY, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Appeal: 14-1797

Doc: 11

Filed: 01/14/2015

Pg: 2 of 3

Yvett C. Rudolph, Appellant Pro Se. John Matthew Baird, Arvind
Jairam, DUANE MORRIS, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 14-1797

Doc: 11

Filed: 01/14/2015

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Yvett C. Rudolph appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her civil action for failure to state a claim.

On

appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in Rudolph’s
informal brief.

4th Cir. R. 34(b); see also United States v.

Brooks, 524 F.3d 549, 556 & n.11 (4th Cir. 2008) (deeming claim
raised for first time in reply brief abandoned).
Rudolph

challenges

the

order

transferring

her

Insofar as

case

from

the

United States District Court for the District of Delaware, we
lack jurisdiction to review this order.

Brock v. Entre Computer

Ctrs., Inc., 933 F.2d 1253, 1257 (4th Cir. 1991).

We have

reviewed the record in light of Rudolph’s remaining claims and
find

no

proceed

reversible
in

forma

error.

pauperis

Accordingly,
and

affirm

reasons stated by the district court.

we

grant

substantially

leave
for

to
the

Rudolph v. HR Specialist,

No. 1:14-cv-00477-LMB-JFA (E.D. Va. June 23, 2014).

We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately

presented

in

the

materials

before

this

court

and

argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

3