L. Ruther v. US Officer

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999422117-2] Originating case number: 1:14-mc-00024-LMB-TCB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999480852]. Mailed to: L. Ruther. [14-1807]

Appeal: 14-1807

Doc: 9

Filed: 11/24/2014

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1807

L. RUTHER,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OFFICERS,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:14-mc-00024-LMB-TCB)

Submitted:

November 20, 2014

Decided:

November 24, 2014

Before KING and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lawrence Ruther, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-1807

Doc: 9

Filed: 11/24/2014

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
L. Ruther appeals the district court’s order finding
that the document he filed there was indecipherable, denying
Ruther leave of court to file the document as a civil action, in
light of his pre-filing injunction, and treating the document as
a miscellaneous matter.
further

action.

reversible

We

error.

The court closed the matter with no

have

reviewed

Accordingly,

we

the
deny

record
leave

and
to

find

no

proceed

in

forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by
the district court.

Ruther v. United States Officers, No. 1:14-

mc-00024-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. July 29, 2014).
oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

materials

legal
before

We dispense with
contentions
this

court

are
and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2