Milton N. Ward, III v. US Dept of Education

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999428792-2] Originating case number: 5:13-cv-00695-D Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999498177]. Mailed to: Ward. [14-1839]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-1839 Doc: 11 Filed: 12/22/2014 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1839 MILTON N. WARD, III, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. (5:13-cv-00695-D) Submitted: December 18, 2014 Decided: December 22, 2014 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Milton N. Ward, III, Appellant Pro Se. Joshua Bryan Royster, Thomas Gray Walker, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-1839 Doc: 11 Filed: 12/22/2014 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Milton N. Ward, III, appeals from the district court’s order upholding the dismissal by the bankruptcy court of Ward’s challenge (2012), to and the constitutionality the bankruptcy of court’s 11 and find no reversible § 523(a)(8) determination student loan debt is not dischargeable. record U.S.C. error. that his We have reviewed the Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ward v. U.S. Dep’t of Educ., No. 5:13-cv-00695-D (E.D.N.C. June 18, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?