Milton N. Ward, III v. US Dept of Education
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999428792-2] Originating case number: 5:13-cv-00695-D Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999498177]. Mailed to: Ward. [14-1839]
Appeal: 14-1839
Doc: 11
Filed: 12/22/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1839
MILTON N. WARD, III,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
James C. Dever, III,
Chief District Judge. (5:13-cv-00695-D)
Submitted:
December 18, 2014
Decided:
December 22, 2014
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Milton N. Ward, III, Appellant Pro Se.
Joshua Bryan Royster,
Thomas Gray Walker, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,
Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-1839
Doc: 11
Filed: 12/22/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Milton N. Ward, III, appeals from the district court’s
order upholding the dismissal by the bankruptcy court of Ward’s
challenge
(2012),
to
and
the
constitutionality
the
bankruptcy
of
court’s
11
and
find
no
reversible
§ 523(a)(8)
determination
student loan debt is not dischargeable.
record
U.S.C.
error.
that
his
We have reviewed the
Accordingly,
we
grant
leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court.
Ward v. U.S. Dep’t of Educ., No.
5:13-cv-00695-D (E.D.N.C. June 18, 2014).
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?