Latasha Askins v. Starting Point

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999419337-2] Originating case number: 4:12-cv-03547-RBH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999457986]. Mailed to: Latasha Askins. [14-1844]

Appeal: 14-1844

Doc: 11

Filed: 10/20/2014

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1844

LATASHA LORRAINE ASKINS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
STARTING POINT;
WISEBURN,

HEATHER

QUENAULT;

MARIA

ROUNDTREE;

LARRY

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(4:12-cv-03547-RBH)

Submitted:

October 16, 2014

Decided:

October 20, 2014

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Latasha Lorraine Askins, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Edward
Justice, Jr., Joseph Jakob Kennedy, TURNER PADGET GRAHAM &
LANEY, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-1844

Doc: 11

Filed: 10/20/2014

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Latasha Lorraine Askins appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellees on Askins’
complaint alleging employment discrimination.
the record and find no reversible error.
for

the

reasons

stated

by

the

We have reviewed

Accordingly, we affirm

district

court.

Askins

v.

Starting Point, No. 4:12-cv-03547-RBH (D.S.C. Aug. 14, 2014).
We also deny Askins’ motion to assign counsel.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal
before

contentions
this

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2