Linda Valerino v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-00089-TSE-JFA. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999554949].. [14-1851]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-1851 Doc: 25 Filed: 03/30/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1851 LINDA I. VALERINO, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., in his official capacity as United States Attorney General, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:14-cv-00089-TSE-JFA) Submitted: February 5, 2015 Decided: March 30, 2015 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Linda I. Valerino, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer Anne Short, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-1851 Doc: 25 Filed: 03/30/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Linda I. Valerino appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellee on Valerino’s claims of employment discrimination, retaliation, and violations of the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a (2012). Valerino also challenges several of the district court’s orders denying her motions for permission to file documents electronically, for recusal of the district court judge, for transfer of venue, and granting in part the Appellee’s motion for a protective order from further discovery. reversible error. We have reviewed the record and find no Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court at the hearing on the Appellee’s summary judgment motion on July 25, 2014 and in its various underlying orders. legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?