Linda Valerino v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-00089-TSE-JFA. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999554949].. [14-1851]
Appeal: 14-1851
Doc: 25
Filed: 03/30/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1851
LINDA I. VALERINO,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., in his official capacity as United
States Attorney General,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
T.S. Ellis, III, Senior
District Judge. (1:14-cv-00089-TSE-JFA)
Submitted:
February 5, 2015
Decided:
March 30, 2015
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Linda I. Valerino, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer Anne Short, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-1851
Doc: 25
Filed: 03/30/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Linda I. Valerino appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellee on Valerino’s
claims of employment discrimination, retaliation, and violations
of
the
Privacy
Act,
5
U.S.C.
§ 552a
(2012).
Valerino
also
challenges several of the district court’s orders denying her
motions
for
permission
to
file
documents
electronically,
for
recusal of the district court judge, for transfer of venue, and
granting in part the Appellee’s motion for a protective order
from further discovery.
reversible error.
We have reviewed the record and find no
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court at the hearing on the Appellee’s summary
judgment motion on July 25, 2014 and in its various underlying
orders.
legal
before
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?