Michael Brown v. Cathy Johnson
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for other relief [999438535-2] Originating case number: 1:14-cv-00432-NCT-LPA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999478957]. Mailed to: Michael Brown. [14-1864]
Appeal: 14-1864
Doc: 8
Filed: 11/20/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1864
MICHAEL W. BROWN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CATHY H. JOHNSON; MONTA DAVIS OLIVER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro.
N. Carlton Tilley,
Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:14-cv-00432-NCT-LPA)
Submitted:
November 18, 2014
Decided:
November 20, 2014
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael W. Brown, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-1864
Doc: 8
Filed: 11/20/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Michael W. Brown seeks to appeal a memorandum opinion
and order of the magistrate judge recommending the dismissal of
his
civil
(2012).
action
pursuant
to
28
U.S.C.
§
1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and
collateral
orders,
28
U.S.C.
§ 1292
(2012);
Fed.
R.
Civ.
P.
54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 54546 (1949).
The order Brown seeks to appeal is neither a final
order nor an interlocutory or collateral order subject to appeal
in this court.
P.
72(a).
jurisdiction.
See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (2012); Fed. R. Civ.
Accordingly,
we
dismiss
the
appeal
for
lack
of
As we lack jurisdiction over the appeal, we deny
Brown’s motion for relief from judgment.
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?