Laurie Jones v. Carolyn Colvin
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-02314-SAG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999538684]. Mailed to: appellant. [14-1866]
Appeal: 14-1866
Doc: 9
Filed: 03/03/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1866
LAURIE JONES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CAROLYN
W.
COLVIN,
Administration,
Commissioner
of
Social
Security
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Stephanie A. Gallagher, Magistrate
Judge. (1:13-cv-02314-SAG)
Submitted:
February 25, 2015
Decided:
March 3, 2015
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Laurie Jones, Appellant Pro Se.
Stacey Winakur Harris, SOCIAL
SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-1866
Doc: 9
Filed: 03/03/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
Jones
the
PER CURIAM:
Laurie
appeals
magistrate
judge’s
order
upholding the Commissioner’s denial of Jones’s application for
disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income,
and a subsequent order denying Jones’ motion to alter or amend
judgment. *
On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised
in the Appellant’s brief.
does
not
challenge
disposition,
Jones
the
has
magistrate judge’s order.
See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).
bases
for
forfeited
the
Because Jones
magistrate
appellate
review
Accordingly, we affirm.
judge’s
of
the
We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
judge.
The parties consented to proceed
See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2012).
2
before
a
magistrate
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?