In re: John Curran, III

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999423232-2] Originating case number: 1:11-cr-00687-RDB-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999491179]. Mailed to: John Curran; Matthew Lunder. [14-1868]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-1868 Doc: 11 Filed: 12/11/2014 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1868 In Re: JOHN F. JEF CURRAN, III, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:11-cr-00687-RDB-1) Submitted: December 3, 2014 Decided: December 11, 2014 Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. John F. Jef Curran, III, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-1868 Doc: 11 Filed: 12/11/2014 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: John F. Jef Curran, III, petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion to vacate conviction in accordance with Fed. R. Crim. P. 52(b). district court He seeks an order from this court directing the to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court has denied the motion. Accordingly, because Curran’s case, we dispense with oral contentions are the deny district the argument adequately court mandamus recently petition because presented has in the the as facts decided moot. We and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?