In re: John Curran, III
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999423232-2] Originating case number: 1:11-cr-00687-RDB-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999491179]. Mailed to: John Curran; Matthew Lunder. [14-1868]
Appeal: 14-1868
Doc: 11
Filed: 12/11/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1868
In Re: JOHN F. JEF CURRAN, III,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(1:11-cr-00687-RDB-1)
Submitted:
December 3, 2014
Decided:
December 11, 2014
Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John F. Jef Curran, III, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-1868
Doc: 11
Filed: 12/11/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
John
F.
Jef
Curran,
III,
petitions
for
a
writ
of
mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting
on his motion to vacate conviction in accordance with Fed. R.
Crim. P. 52(b).
district
court
He seeks an order from this court directing the
to
act.
Our
review
of
the
district
court’s
docket reveals that the district court has denied the motion.
Accordingly,
because
Curran’s
case,
we
dispense
with
oral
contentions
are
the
deny
district
the
argument
adequately
court
mandamus
recently
petition
because
presented
has
in
the
the
as
facts
decided
moot.
We
and
legal
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?